wheave.blogg.se - Adobe stock

However, Adobe’s smallest monthly plan comes with only 3 downloads, while Shutterstock’s comes with 10.

Notably, both offer subscription plans of the same size (10, 40, 350, 750), meaning monthly downloads. Overall, Shutterstock is slightly more affordable. In addition, Shutterstock provides a yearly prepaid option, which is 11% cheaper than the regular yearly plan. Subscription plansīoth agencies offer similar subscription plans with monthly and annual commitments. Subscriptions are better for those who need images (or videos) consistently, whereas on-demand plans are better for occasional image downloads. In this review, I’ll answer your question, “Is Adobe Stock better than Shutterstock or is Shutterstock better than Adobe Stock?”.Īdobe Stock and Shutterstock sell content with subscription plans (cheap) and on-demand (flexible).

Shutterstock is better for businesses and individuals who are only interested in downloading stock photos because it’s cheaper ($0.22/photo) than Adobe Stock ($0.26/photo).

You only pay for the images you use on export. Thanks to Adobe Stock’s integration into these apps, you can access stock images for free.

Adobe Stock is better for designers using Adobe Creative Cloud apps, like Adobe Premiere, Photoshop, Illustrator, and others.

Quick summaryīased on my in-depth research and experience, I suggest the following: I tested, reviewed, or used every major stock photo site, including Shutterstock and Adobe Stock. I spent the better half of my life learning about photography, and that includes stock photography.